Today (Friday), Philip Cunnah (21, right) and Ryan Day (22, left) were both accepted into seminary by the Diocese of Middlesbrough! What fantastic news! (p.s. I usually hate using exclamation marks, but today is an exception)
This is the Catholic blog of Richard Marsden, doing exactly what it says on the tin. As well as my diary entries, it includes news and views from a young Catholic's perspective, primarily focusing on promoting the defence of human life from the moment of conception until natural death.
Today (Friday), Philip Cunnah (21, right) and Ryan Day (22, left) were both accepted into seminary by the Diocese of Middlesbrough! What fantastic news! It was absolute chaos in Central London. Tube stations were rammed and there was restricted access to quite a few routes. However, managed to get to the Oratory for 4:30pm Mass. A Sunday afternoon Mass was new territory for me. Really have never heard of them before this weekend. Maybe it's just a southern thing...
There was some great news today on the pro-life front.
The Independent, followed up by several other media and press organisations, reported that “an unprecedented” number of doctors are refusing to be involved in carrying out procedures. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) has warned that the situation threatens to plunge the abortion service into chaos.
The pro-choice lobby has tried to come up with every excuse in the book to account for the RCOG’s findings. The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) says the new generation of doctors have no understanding or experience of the so-called situation with back-street abortions prior to 1967. She said many doctors failed to appreciate that contraception sometimes failed or people did not use it properly.
Hopefully, the reason for this shift is simple. The medical profession can no longer deal with the horror of the abortion procedure, with the deliberate destruction of innocent human life and with the distinct contradiction abortion involves, against their caring and life-preserving role.
This story has provided a clear indication of how overwhelmingly biased most of the mainstream media is in favour of the pro-abortion lobby. Notice the complete lack of representation from the pro-life side in many reports. The Guardian goes with “ ‘Intolerant’ doctors blamed for looming abortion crisis”, completely dominating their story with the British Pregnancy Advisory Service’s position. Many young doctors are unwilling to provide terminations because they believe there is no good excuse for unwanted pregnancies, according to Ann Furedi. The BBC’s Today programme was unsurprisingly, many may say, worse. They questioned both Ann Furedi and spokesperson for RCOG Dr Kate Guthrie, of Hull Royal Infirmary, and gave both an easy ride. Here is the link. The most sickening of Ms Furedi’s comments was: “It [abortion] can be a very rewarding area for doctors to work in.”
Today’s headlines might a rare welcome piece of good news for the pro-life lobby in Britain, but it mustn’t be complacent. We need to be on guard to protect contentious objection and resist attempts for abortion procedures to become a mandatory part of the medical curriculum. Even medics who do contentiously object are under great pressure to refer patients on to doctors who will perform and give permission for terminations. This effectively amounts to collaboration with the evil of abortion.
Now that my report about the brief (exclusive) interview I did with Catholic MP and former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith at the Life Conference (two weekend's ago) has been published in The Universe, I can now reveal the full text of our four minute meeting. I only got to ask him four questions and then he was called away to do his excellent speech based on his work as founder of the Centre for Social Justice. My next couple of questions were about the SORs but I didn't get chance to ask them. However, luckily, he did comment on them in response to another question.This year is the 40th Anniversary of the Abortion Act coming up in October. What do you think are the consequences of 40 years of legalised abortion in Britain?
Like all these things, only after they have been done really we only begin to know for certain what the effects are. I think the staggering number of abortions in Britain is something that is necessary to be looked at. The abortion side of it doesn’t seem to have affected our levels of teenage pregnancy either because we are now topping the league of teenage pregnancies as well as I think we top the league of abortions which both go hand in glove. It suggests something deeper, there’s a deeper malaise I think in British society which I deal with in the report I made in December called breakdown Britain is something fundamentally difficult about what’s happening out there. I mean I’m one of those that has supported the idea that we should look again at the time scales on this and I think Nadine Dorries brought a bill forward the other day which I thought was worth supporting as a way of teasing out the debate and I think it is necessary for the debate to come about the time limits on abortion.
What are the dangers of further liberalisation of the law?
I’m not aware that there were any great pressures to liberalise it I think the real debate now is whether you curtail the time limits on abortion. And the area I’d very much like looked at is the area of those with mental incapacity where there are literally no time limits or physical disability, there are no time limits. So it seems to me that if you are disabled then you are a second class citizen in the eyes of the law and I don’t think that can be allowed to run for very much longer either.
Turning to the Mental Capacity Act which, of course, comes into force this year as well, obviously you were a strong opponent of that and particularly the euthanasia by ommission element. Do you think there's still a big loophole in this law?
Yes I do and I think it’s becoming to be found out too. I’ve heard a number of reports about issues and problems beginning to arise in hospitals. The doctors who warned about this were right. I think all of this is always driven by the euthanasia groups, those who want euthanasia and they disguise their position in all sorts of different ways and this whole drive is nothing to do with putting that which was a problem right. What it was all about was getting the first bit of the door open as it where to the next stage of the debate which keeps rolling and you always see that in Lord Joffe’s bill which is a desire for euthanasia. And I’m utterly opposed to that.Do you think in that particular Act it was the government's intention to legalise euthanasia or do you just think it was a badly drafted piece of legislation?
This is a government which is obsessed with the idea of rights over the balance of rights. I mean one person’s rights cannot be rights to be taken away from somebody else. And I think what’s going on here is that we have a government which seems to have no compass when it arrives at these issues. You can see this from the sexual orientation bill the other day the way they’ve driven these regulations through without any care or consideration for what will happen to children when it comes to adoption, what will happen in education when it comes to sex education, and what happens to parents because throughout all these changes parents seem to be the last people in the world to be consulted or to be asked. So I think the present Government is a government which has no moral compass at all as far as I can see. It just seems obsessed on this competing rights issue.