Wednesday, 18 February 2009

Heterosexual couples opt for civil partnerships

I was alarmed to read that heterosexual couples in France are increasingly opting for "gay civil partnership ceremonies" rather than marriages to avoid the possibility of expensive - wait for it - divorces!

Apparently, 90 per cent of "Civil Solidarity Pacts" a year are now being made by heterosexual couples. This is despite the fact these were specifically intended for homosexuals.

They take 15 minutes and can be done by a court clerk - and the partnership can be ended by a letter. And yes, you guessed it, the pacts provide nearly the same financial and administrative protections as proper marriages. A staggering 150,000 couples are "Pacs" in France every year, of which around 135,000 of them are heterosexuals.

The fact so many are doing this is very alarming. We now have a situation where many couples don't want to give their lives to each other and to God in marriage - in case it all goes wrong. And going into a so-called "pact" as opposed to marriage because "it might not work out after all" is certainly a positive attitude to have isn't it (obviously being overtly sarcastic)? It actually sounds quite depressing that these couples are resigned to the possibility that their "commitment" might not last long. What a relationship that's going to be. "But we'll do this pact thingy anyway so we can get all the benefits" (sorry I can't translate into French as I only did up to GCSE...).

It's ironic most people going for one of these civil partnerships (meant for gays) are heterosexual. Obviously gay civil partnerships are an abuse of the sanctity of marriage. The natural purpose of sexual union cannot be achieved by same sex partnerships, nor can a same sex couple co-operate with God to create new life. But for people of the opposite sex to opt for one of these fluffy agreements is a real visible, public sign of our "I want" society. It's the perfect example of what relativism has done.

Perhaps we can point couples thinking about opting for a civil partnership to the Catechism:

Marriage is not a purely human institution despite the many variations it may have undergone through the centuries in different cultures, social structures, and spiritual attitudes.

...the marriage bond has been established by God himself in such a way that a marriage concluded and consummated between baptized persons can never be dissolved. This bond, which results from the free human act of the spouses and their consummation of the marriage, is a reality, henceforth irrevocable, and gives rise to a covenant guaranteed by God's fidelity. The Church does not have the power to contravene this disposition of divine wisdom.


Either marriage is a coming together of a man and a woman who freely commit themselves to God and to bringing new life into the world - or it's an agreement written on a bit of paper and a chance for a booze up (although maybe not so much in France).

I want to be a dramatic columnist-type journalist and say this piece of news is the first nail in the coffin for the institution of marriage in western Europe. But I think the Church's indissoluble Sacrament of Marriage will prevail.

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

Our right to know

The Sunday Telegraph reports the outrageous news that the Pro-Life Alliance (PLA) is being barred by the Government from a hearing about whether abortion figures in cases of disability should be released. Not only this, the Government is referring to legal proceedings usually used in terrorist trials to ban them.

After a public outcry in 2005 over the abortion of a child with a cleft palate at 28 weeks, the Department of Health (DoH) stopped publishing statistics if fewer than 10 cases were carried out under this clause. The alliance applied under the Freedom of Information Act for the figures to be revealed and the Information Commissioner has upheld their case. But the Government claims the data could lead to women who have had late abortions being identified. This is despite the fact that names and addresses of women who have had abortions are never published as part of the annual figures.

I can't believe how much of a cover up this is. When the Abortion Act was amended in 1990, we were assured that "serious handicap" would mean "serious". But it hasn't turned out that way.

This is besides the point, of course. Any abortion because a disability has been detected in the unborn child is the ultimate discrimination against disabled human beings - to not even recognise the child has anything worth living for just because it isn't perfect. This clause is part of a law that regulates the most common operation performed in the UK each day. Surely we the public have the right to know the reasons why these children are aborted? The Pro-Life Alliance shouldn't even have to appeal for this information. It should be already there.

It's ironic that a members of an organisation - which gave out such a strong comment attacking the BBC for portraying pro-lifers as child murderers in the recent TV drama Hunter - should now be virtually treated like terrorists themselves.

The PLA is in a battle for freedom of information. Previously, it has fought battles against censorship and democracy - and lost. In 1997 and 2001, the alliance (an active political party as it was then) had their party election broadcast censored by the BBC because they contained pictures of aborted babies. It meant the most common operation in the UK was not allowed to be broadcast on the public service broadcaster. The alliance's appeal to the High Court was rejected.(I used this case in a seminar at university on free speech in the media. All students in the room agreed the broadcast should not have been censored. And believe me, hardly any of them were remotely pro-life.)

In a later election, BBC Online initially refused to link the alliance's website on its list of political parties because it contained pictures of aborted babies - the reality of how the procedure ends.

And, perhaps most shockingly, two of its candidates in the 2003 Welsh Assembly election campaign were arrested for holding up a picture of a dismembered 21-week-old aborted baby in Newport city centre. Joseph Biddulph and Fiona Pinto were locked up for three hours before being charged for a public order offense. They were found not guilty by magistrates.

When you consider what lengths other campaign groups (particularly the green agenda fanatics) go to in order to get their message across without many cases even reaching court, I think we can safely presume the establishment doesn't really like pro-life groups, especially in light of the Government reportedly treating the PLA like terrorists.

The alliance was in a battle for freedom of expression, now it's fighting against secrecy. We should support them.

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

Tony Blair: President of Europe?

LifeSite reports the Daily Mail's story that Tony Blair is being tipped for the President of Europe post by French president Nicolas Sarkozy.

This is alarming news, particularly in light of Mr Blair's dreadful voting record as an MP and his Government's anti-life policies with regard to abortion, embryo research, euthanasia by omission etc. After becoming a Catholic, there is evidence that Mr Blair continues to promote pro-abortion organisations. He teamed up with one of Canada's best-known pro-abortion figures (as reported by John Smeaton's blog). Belinda Stronach, a prominent businesswoman and former MP, joined her foundation with Mr Blair's Faith Foundation in December to promote the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Mr Blair's Government interpreted the MDGs as including a universal right to abortion on demand.

The European Union is fast becoming one of the most anti-life powers in the world, promoting and funding abortion services in third world countries and advocating destructive research on human embryos. One would expect things to get worse under a Blair presidency.

The creation of this post is dependent on the highly controversial Lisbon treaty being passed. Should this happen (and, for the record, I sincerely hope it doesn't), the EU president will be a full-time official, serving a two-and-half-year term.

The story reminds me of this brilliant speech made by William Hague, one of the best parliamentary orators in modern politics.

The Hermeneutic's party

On Saturday I left Kettering by train at 7.30am to get to The Hermeneutic's parish for the Missa Cantata followed by the party to celebrate his one millionth blog visitor.

It was my first ever experience of the old Mass and I have to say I thought it was rather glorious, despite being a bit baffled through most of it. However, this was something I expected. Mum and dad, as well as priests, had told me bits and bobs about parts of the Tridentine Mass. I thought the best plan of action was to just sit at the back, observe and join in with the Latin I knew, without trying to flick around in the booklet to follow it.

I am a lay person used to going to Masses where they sing "Happy Birthday" before the end every Sunday to whoever's celebrating that particular week. I've been at Masses where draws for raffles have been made after communion, with the barrel and cuddly toys plonked on the altar, numbers bellowed out by the priest and people shouting back with their winning ticket aloft. I've been at Masses with bizarre, so-called "liturgical dances" and "youth Masses", that I probably used to like when I was younger, where flags and banners were waved about. I could go on all day...

Saturday, by contrast, was a breath of fresh air. Even though I didn't quite know what was going on or what was being said a lot of the time, the Mass was authentic, steeped in the beauty of the traditions of the Church. There was no faffing about. The exact movements of the priest and altar servers, the chanting and incense made the Mass solemn. You could clearly recognise that this is Calvary, the joining of heaven and earth, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

I'd conclude that I'm still more than satisfied with the Novus Ordo when said by the book and without fuss. After all, according to the Church, the Mass is the Mass. But after Saturday's experience, I'll certainly be seeking out more opportunities to discover the old rite.

During his homily, Fr Tim mentioned the apostolate of digital communication and, in particular, blogging. He said that young people were particularly skilled at blogging and that it was a wonderful opportunity to bring people to the Church. He also quoted from the Pope Benedict's message for this year's World Communications Day. In it, the Pope says:

It falls, in particular, to young people, who have an almost spontaneous affinity for the new means of communication, to take on the responsibility for the evangelisation of this "digital continent". Be sure to announce the Gospel to your contemporaries with enthusiasm. You know their fears and their hopes, their aspirations and their disappointments: the greatest gift you can give to them is to share with them the "Good News" of a God who became man, who suffered, died and rose again to save all people.
After Mass, we went into the parish social club for a great party. Other bloggers in attendance included Mulier Fortis and there were many readers of Fr Tim's blog. The Hermeneutic of Continuity is read by so many people and has become a fantastic apostolate. It was the inspiration for me to start Bashing Secularism and for many others to begin writing about their faith online. Fr Tim manages to grab the headlines, generate news stories for the Catholic press and provides a strong, orthodox voice online for the Catholics in the UK.

We had a pint or two and a lovely buffet and Fr Tim made a brief speech, some of which I caught on camera (not great quality):

video

Unfortunately, I couldn't stay for the rest of the afternoon as I had the small matter of Chelsea v Hull City to attend in north London at 3pm. At Blackfen, I met keen blog reader Delia, who very kindly gave me a lift to the train station.

Despite several annoying tube line closures, I got to the match in plenty of time. City held Chelsea to a 0-0 draw in probably one of the best games I've ever seen the Tigers play. A great day all round!

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

Peterborough Cathedral

While in Peterborough a few weekends ago giving the White Flower appeal at Fr Bruce Burbidge's parish, I had a free afternoon and headed into town to do some shopping and visit the city's Saxon cathedral. Founded in the Saxon period, the architecture is mainly Norman following a rebuild in the 12th century. Along with Durham and Ely Cathedrals, it is one of the most important 12th century buildings in England to have remained largely intact, despite extensions, restorations and dissolutions. It is the burial place of Katherine of Aragon and the former home of Mary Queen of Scots' body. Unfortunately, I wasn't particularly impressed by the place.

First of all, it is probably the most Protestant place I've been to in England. People tell me Westminster Cathedral is pretty Protestant, but I've not been inside there as yet. At Peterborough, the main indicator was a quote from the guide book:
During Cromwell's Commonwealth...cathedrals were abolished. A famous eyewitnnes account survives, describing the desecration of Peterborough Cathedral by Parliamentarian soldiers in 1643. Motivated by Puritanism they to some extent purified the building, for it has hardly any of the ostentatious monuments cluttering other cathedrals, and by destroying the stained glass they allowed God's light to shine on the beautiful Barnack stone.

Another clue is the reference to relics on one of the display boards explaining the history of the place. The arm of St Oswald (633-642) and the bloodstained shirt and stone flag of St Thomas Becket, brought in 1777, are just two sets of relics to have been kept in the cathedral. But on this display board (unfortunately I can't remember the exact quote) there was some reference to the "medieval" Christian ritual of venerating relics. Arrrgghhhamm...we still do this to bring us closer to Christ through his saints!

To be honest, my impression of the place was further tinted by my visit experience. Many of the volunteers were unwelcoming and looked rather depressed. Then a batty and downright rude elderly volunteer made a b-line for me as I wandered into the second half of the cathedral.

"Are you here for Evensong," she asked abruptly. "Not particularly - just here for a look around," I said. "Then please leave this area. You're not allowed in this part during Evensong." At this point she shoved me away and closed a gate. I couldn't believe it. It's not as if the aisle I wanted to walk down would have meant me interrupting a very average Evensong in the choir.

I wandered towards the back of the church and sat down to read the guidebook and the display boards. Then, a few moments later I walked towards the "forbidden area" again. Before I got anywhere near it, another, younger woman walked several yards straight for me to tell me I couldn't go any further. At this point I promptly said "okay" and walked out of the place, hopefully for the last time. It meant I missed the two main attractions, the grave and former grave of Katherine of Aragon and Mary Queen of Scots. But, in fact, I actually enjoyed the pleasant surroundings of the minister yard more than the inside of the thirteen-and-a-half centuries old place of worship.

As one of Fr Bruce's parishioners said at Mass later that evening when I told him about my experience: "That's the Church of England for you."

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

40 Martyr Reflections: Saint John Rigby

Saint John Rigby, one of the few laymen to be included in the 40 Martyrs list, attended court on behalf of a laywoman accused of recucancy who could not represent herself due to ill health. But it was his own religion that one of the commissioners who took a dislike to him asked him about. He had no hesitation in proclaiming that he was a practicing Catholic himself. Walking into court a free man, he was sent to prison and was only free again when he entered Heaven after enduring arguably the most brutal execution of any of the martyrs, proceeded by horrendous torture. But Mr Rigby showed signs of sainthood by being bafflingly polite to his aggressors.

Not much is known of John’s life. He seems to have been a simple man and a bachelor. He was born in 1570, the youngest son of Nicholas Rigby, a gentleman from a long established family that lived at Harrocks Hall in Eccleston, Lancashire. Although being a Catholic, John flirted with the Protestant religion, sometimes going to church services. Some accounts state that he met Jesuits Fr John Gerard and Nicholas Owen, the latter of which is also one of the 40 Martyrs.

He worked as a servant in the avid Protestant household of Sir Edmund Huddleston, whose daughter was Mrs Fortescue, a recent widow. She received a summons accusing her of recucancy. Suffering from illness, she asked John to go to court to testify for her against the charges. This simple request ultimately meant martyrdom for John.

One of the commissioners, Sir Richard Martin, didn’t like John and began to question him about his own faith. Sir Richard proved John was a Catholic and the young man would not take the oath of Supremacy. He was sent to Newgate prison in the City of London. The next day, February 14 1600, he was up before the Lord Chief Justice. He initially admitted to conforming to the new religion even though being a Catholic at heart. But John said he had been reconciled to Catholicism by Fr John Jones, a Franciscan, while serving in the Clink. Since that day about three years previously, he had not stepped foot into a Protestant Church. He signed a written confession admitting to this.

At some point during his imprisonment, John was lowered on to an open heated oven scorching and burning his flesh. At the same time, a barber cut his hair off. The horrific torture was an attempt to force Rigby into revealing information about Catholics in England. In an amazing act of defiance that, in itself, seems like an indication of sainthood, John paid the barber for his work and they both laughed.

On February 19 he was transferred to the White Lion. This had been an inn prior to 1535 and became the Sheriff's Prison in 1540. On March 1 1600, Rigby was brought to trial. Interestingly, we have a detailed account from John about the various court proceedings. He wrote a testimony while in prison and sent it to a friend to look after.

At the initial hearing, nothing was said to Rigby. But in the evening, John was called and went willingly to an informal questioning by judges at one of their houses. Craftily trying to get him to conform, Justice Gaudy said he heard John wanted to go to church again. But the 30-year-old said he’d never even hinted that. The judge said the law must proceed to which Rigby replied: "Let me have the law, in the name of Jesus. God’s will be done."

The next day he appeared in court and answered to charges of being reconciled by a "Romish" priest and treason. He admitted to going to Fr John Jones for confession and said if this was interpreted as treason then "God’s will be done". When found guilty by the quietly-spoken foreman of the jury, John shouted: "Laus tibi, Domine! Rex aterna Gloria."

Twice after being found guilty, John was offered the choice of agreeing to go to the Protestant church and the matter would "proceed no further". But he refused to each time and was sentenced to death. He was taken back to his prison cell and prayed all night.

When his time came on Saturday June 21, John said goodbye to fellow Catholic prisoners and asked them to pray for him. Outside, he knelt beside the waiting hurdle and made the Sign of the Cross. He was seen to be laughing, which John confirmed was because he was happy to give his life for the Catholic cause. As part of the paperwork before his execution, Captain Whitlock asked John if he was married, to which he replied: "I am a bachelor; and more than that, I am a maid." This referred to his service job in the Huddleston household. The captain said Rigby had "worthily deserved a virgin’s crown" and asked John to pray for him.

St Thomas’ Watering, now the Old Kent Road, was John’s place of execution. It was the location of the gallows for the northern parts of Surrey. Once, it was a place were pilgrims bound for the shrine of St Thomas a Becket watered their thirsty horses. Now it was to become a significant site again for Christian martyrdom.

On reaching the gallows, John knelt down and prayed. He kissed the rope as it was placed around his neck. Eyewitnesses remarked upon his fine physique and outstanding courage.
The sheriff’s deputy ended John’s closing speech before it started and demanded he pray for Queen Elizabeth I, which he did. Asked to name any other traitors in England, John said none. The angry deputy ordered the cart to be drawn away instantly.

Choking, Mr Rigby violently jerked around. The hangman cut him down and John, not being close to death, got to his feet. He was flung to the ground and John was able to commend his soul to God. The executioner then disemboweled the soon-to-be martyr and ripped his organs out. John’s body twisted violently. The end of his ordeal came when his head was chopped off. His body parts were displayed across Southwark.

For a simple, humble, young single man, Saint John Rigby’s torture and execution was brutal. For some reason, the authorities clamped down hard on him, while other lay people at the time were simply imprisoned for their recucancy. Mr Rigby’s act of charity towards a grieving widow was to turn out to be the ultimate sacrifice.

Saint John was not perfect. He flirted with the new religion but knew he could be reconciled back to Christ’s church through the Sacrament of Reconciliation administered by a Catholic priest (who was also to become a saint). What a powerful message this is to the laity in encouraging them to confession, even if they have lapsed.

Also impressive is John’s stubbornness and defiance in the face of persecution. He tells the truth, bravely answering questions like a true Lancastrian - direct and to the point. Too often we young Catholics stutter and water down our answers to challenging questions about the Faith for fear that the recipient, however powerful he or she may be, will not like our answer. Like Saint John, we really need to pray for the strength to answer directly but charitably. This martyr had the ability to point most of his thoughts and words to Christ.

Fittingly, Saint John is the patron saint of bachelors and torture victims – two completely different groups of people but both of whom will receive great strength from this martyr’s intercession.

Like many of the English martyrs, Saint John has a RC Sixth Form collage named after him in Wigan.

Saint John Rigby, Ora Pro Nobis.

Monday, 2 February 2009

TV appearance

At Mass on Sunday back in my parish in Hull, loads of people came up to me to say: "I saw you on TV on Wednesday." In fact, I got this all weekend from various people I knew.
My five seconds of fame came live on Sky Sports when the camera homed in on my looking rather wet and gloomy at Upton Park where Hull City were playing West Ham. I was sat on the front row. In the 40th minute, we were one nil down. I happened to look up at the big screen at the opposite end of the ground and saw someone who looked like me on it. I did a little sway and, sure enough, the person on the screen did the same. A few minutes later I looked at my phone - about six text messages, two missed calls and a phone message. They all told me I'd been on TV and had different interpretations on what I was muttering!
As it was a midweek game and it was live on Sky, loads of people back in Hull were glued to their TV sets and many other non-City supporting football-loving friends were watching. Later, I heard stories about people shouting "It's Marsden" in the middle of a pub and getting looked at like they were a nutter. Even a friend, who was on a trip to France, made drinkers jump in a Paris bar when he shouted out upon spotting me.
At the weekend' s home game against West Brom, I had people looking at me and sniggering in the street and fans who I sit near in the stadium said they had seen me.
In the end, Wednesday's game finished 2-0 to West Ham but it was a good day out in London. Here's a few pictures of my view in the front row:

The players warm up

Kevin Kilbane takes a corner for the Tigers


Andy Dawson whips one into the box

Sunday, 1 February 2009

Cabinet papers: Vatican talks during World War II

During my search of Cabinet files, I came across an intriguing memorandum from the foreign secretary on October 13 1942 about his meeting with the US emissary to the Holy See, Myron Taylor.

The memo says Mr Taylor’s journey to Rome was fulfilled, namely, to "discourage the Vatican from any untimely peace initiative" at that time. The document includes Mr Taylor’s memo to Pope Pius XII, in which he argues the US is fighting in a just war and that "complete victory" for the Allies is the only way to achieve peace. He says:

In the conviction that anything less than complete victory would endanger the principles we fight for and our very existence as a nation, the United States of America wall prosecute this war until the Axis collapses.

There is reason to believe that our Axis enemies will attempt, through devious channels, to urge the Holy See to endorse in the near future proposals of peace without victory…We therefore feel it a duty to support, the Holy See in resisting any undue pressure from this source. It is for this reason that we feel impelled to make known our views on the subject of peace, and to point out that the growing power of the United States is now being applied to re-establish those principles of international decency and justice which have been so well expounded by the Holy See.
He describes the Holy See has having "magnificent moral leading" and said promotion of world peace is one of the great functions of the Holy See. He attacks the Nazis for their accusations that there are 60 million atheists in the US, added that "the persecutors of religion are trying to use the church for their own sinister purposes".

Mr Taylor says the US fights with a clear conscience. He also complements the statements made in the editorials of American Catholic papers and by the hierarchy in the US in the wake of Pearl Harbour. In a response to a letter by the bishops that expressed their pledge to defend freedom against aggression, President Franklin D Roosevelt said: "We shall win this war and in victory we shall seek not vengeance but the establishment of an international order in which the spirit of Christ shall rule the hearts of men and of nations."

Also in the report is an interesting document on the state of the Church in Russia. The Communist regime had done all in its power make itself "into something like a competing religious life in its own right, with similar requirements of spiritual devotion and even of public profession in ceremony and symbol", it says. When Germany began to occupy large portions of Soviet territory, they found a genuine hunger for religious experience in large parts of the Russian population.

The Nazis have been exploiting this situation for their own purposes with characteristic cynicism and, I am afraid, with some success.
Apparently, in Pskov, Germans found no priests left in the city at all but they promptly imported two priests from the Russian Orthodox Church. The great Cathedral was reopened in time for the Russian Christmas in January. On Christmas the Cathedral was packed and thousands more stood in the square outside in 30 degrees of frost during the service. Untrained laymen, in some cases even old women, conducted services informally in railway stations and Christians flocked to them.

In the memo, there is also a "strictly personal memorandum" giving a summary of the conversation between Mgr Tardini, the Cardinal Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and Mr Taylor about the dangerous situation of the Church in Russia.

This section reports that no Russian priests had been freed from prison or from the sentence of deportation to which they had previously been condemned. In the Archdiocese of Mohilew alone, approximately one hundred Catholic priests were detained in prison or in concentration camps. The note says:

For more than a year now there has been no news of His Excellency M. Edward Profittlich, Titular Archbishop of Aclrianopli and Apostolic Administrator of Estonia. Archbishop Profittlich, a citizen of Estonia, was arrested at Tallinn, the 28th June, 1941, and deported, to the Urals, probably to Kasan.
Ending this intriguing memorandum is a message from Count Dalla Torre, director of the Vatican’s newspaper, Osservatore Romano.